I've got nothing but appreciation for Mick Stinear's time as our coach, but scientists at the Demonblog Institute have confirmed that waiting all year for the first awkward meeting in a final, then blowing the biggest lead in AFLW history, and losing thanks to a missed sitter is PISS FUNNY. May he enjoy good times at Geelong, preferably finishing second behind us every year, but unless the legacy of the Princes Park Miracle is ruined by them coming back to beat us in the Grand Final, the key memory of Stinear vs Melbourne Pt. 1 will always be the tremendous cock-up of losing from 28 points in front in the third quarter.
If you move the game to a different timeslot it doesn't play out in the same way (take note: people who moan about 25/09/21 not happening in Victoria, as if we'd definitely still have finished the game with a 100-7 to run), but this was a prime time finish with more storylines than a season of Home and Away. Instead, it played the opening act of a double header at 1.05pm. If you're also a bozo who hasn't yet cancelled Kayo for the summer, coverage started what was meant to be five minutes before the bounce. Which hardly screamed 'frenzied finals atmosphere'. I don't know why Foxtel wasted their time putting pre-match studio shows on for ordinary games earlier in the season, but I guess their $3.50 AFLW budget has been exhausted, and we didn't even get that.
You'd have been lucky to know this was on if not specifically looking for it. In Kayo's 'Live and Upcoming' scroller, it came after cricket (fair enough), V8 Supercars (ok), college American Football (?), Padel (!?) and the Australian Volleyball Superleague (sure, why not). For what these bastards charge, the system should know that someone who pretty much only ever watches AFL/W would prefer a final to the Canberra Heat vs Adelaide Storm volleyball blockbuster.
There's always the option of watching Channel 7, if you want every goal to be followed by Mon Conti saying "right stitch up" as if she's being held at gunpoint by militants. But if you also made the mistake of trying to access the game at exactly 1pm and had to use every bit of willpower available to scroll the 'tennis in a plastic box' intensity of Padel, the first bounce was delayed by nearby lightning. Last week the game carried on after the lightning allegedly got within 'stop the game' range, so I don't know what the difference was here. It played havoc with the limited time I had to watch live, but best not risk everyone being flambeéd for my convenience.
Even without the ex-coach shenanigans, this game had as much box office potential as possible in front of a crowd of 4743. Geelong, unable to play at home due to people jumping bikes over large mounds of dirt (notably absent from the list of fringe sports available on Kayo), arrived with the best attacking record in AFLW history, while we're the ultimate all-rounders. Not the best in any category, none of the players ever win major awards, but it all comes together in a 'near enough to the top in every aspect' to make us dangerous opposition for anybody except North after the first quarter.
For the first 2.5 quarters we were outplayed, but also had all sorts of bad luck. Like Hore standing on her own inside 50 early in the first quarter, only for the ball to develop a sense of humour instead of sitting up perfectly for her to turn around and snap. Due to being great, the captain was still able to regather for another shot, but the moment had passed. Geelong's kick-in barely made it across the 50 before it was back with Harris for a set shot. She's done plenty of good things this year, but kicking accuracy is not amongst them. The trend continued with a big helicoptering slopball that went OOF in the pocket.
All the attack was to the left of screen, but we've seen multiple games this year where the opposition failed to take advantage of early chances, and it wound up costing them dearly. Which nearly happened here, but after a player ran the half marathon on her way inside 50 without bouncing, they botched the finale, it remained goalless, and the game went into a few minutes of teams going up and down the ground for no reward. As far as finals go, the first W outing didn't exactly hit the heights of the last two games in the M season.
Finally, it looked like things were going our way when Bannan marked 20 metres out directly in front. Which was nice. Then hit the post, which wasn't. At the time this looked like a horribly blown opportunity, but was revealed as part of long-term Usual Suspects-style storytelling in the final minute. And after we'd done all that attack for just three behinds and cleared multiple chances down the other end, the opposition got lucky c/o a defender hopefully hoofing the ball from distance, which got the perfect bounce to skip through past a looming Lauren Pearce. Bah.
One chance of a response died when Horisk got a valuable learning experience about what not to do when running into an open goal on a slight angle. Another disappeared at the end of the quarter when the ball once more refused to go where we needed it to. It wasn't our most inspiring start, but we've started with 0.0 and won before, so no need to quaff poison yet. But you may have thought about mixing your Erin Patterson Mushroom Surprise milkshake when McNamara and Mahony had a "you first, no you first" moment over running onto a loose ball inside 50 early in the second term. This led to the ball going *BOING* down the other end, where ex-Melburnian Jacqueline Parry ran into an open goal. Which was 2x better than her last season with us, which generated just three behinds from eight games.
There was now bright sunshine (for those not kicking to the Carlton Wall End), but we were playing like a team still waiting to be incinerated by lightning at any moment. After doing well to keep the scoring juggernaut to one fluky goal in the first half, the old floodgates were starting to heave under pressure, and I was ready to get morbidly depressed as a kick headed for a forward standing in miles of space. That was, until Gillard turned up at the last minute with one of her famous Inspector Gadget spoils. This led to the ball arriving at a spot in front of our goal where any mark would've likely led to a goal (having said that, based on some of the other set shots...), before landing in the middle of about four Melbourne players.
Meanwhile, down the other end Geelong kicked one from 40 metres out, and you got the feeling that things were about to go tits up. But a team three goals to zilch up at Princes Park, what could possibly go wrong? Something had to, because our performance until the epic comeback was about as much fun as doing your taxes while being dipped into an erupting volcano. Like when they got another goal via plucked from the arse crumb not long after we'd been rorted out of a free on the wing.
Things were going so badly that we spectacularly violated the 6-6-6 rule, with Fitzsimon having to run back to defence from the other end of the ground to comply. Unlike Matthew Richardson whinging about the warning every time it happens, I've got no problem with giving teams one free administrative error before they're penalised, but the payoff should be that you don't get to choose who goes where. The nearest player to the backline has to move there, the player incorrectly roaming the forward 50 has to stand 1cm inside the midfield zone, and stiff shit if the opposition takes advantage.
You may have considered necking a suspiciously bubbling concoction when Bannan dropped a mark right in front of goal, then Hanks got buried in a savage tackle. But enter the returning McNamara, fresh from a few weeks drinking through a straw to breathe life into a game that looked as if it would be dead by half-time. This had to survive the AFL's world leading 'Score Assist' technology, which didn't even have the same goal line vision as Unley bloody Oval.
After that excitement, we nearly gave the goal straight back after a Geelong forward made light contact in the back seem like she'd been hit by a cannonball. The kick missed, and our hopes of avoiding the peril of a potential straight sets finish remained alive. That's until Parry marked with a broken time clock showing 1.56 instead of the actual 0.00, the person pushing the siren button held it down for so long that they were either a) really keen to let you know it was supposed to be half time, or; b) had died face first on the console. A difficult kick became a certainty when she got a 50 for somebody slightly breaching the protected zone.
I understand if the player runs across the mark during the run-up, but isn't the protected zone supposed to stop interference when quick play ons? Which you can't do when kicking a set shot after the siren. So what does it matter if somebody briefly wanders into the same postcode? You don't want to encourage players to hang around within earshot of the kicking, yelling slurs to put them off, but common sense says the accidental wander past is hardly worth conceding a goal.
Conceding in those circumstances said everything you needed to know about our first half. But, as coach Stinear was no doubt aware, the last Melbourne/Geelong final involved a massive thwarted comeback. So, for all the relevance that game had three seasons later, YOU NEVER KNEW (*insert ominous foreshadowing music* - soundtrack editor). But you did know (and turned out to be wrong), when the ball got right in front of our goal seconds into the quarter for no score, then Taylor injured an ankle when the ever-present Parry rolled her up like a wrestling pinfall.
This led to a goal from O'Hehir of all people, but quicker than you could do the deviant Sid James O'Hehhehehehehehir laugh, they cancelled it out. When another came straight after, I'd had just about enough of footy for the 2026 calendar year. Then Harris got hurt too, and I wondered if the volleyball was still on. But never mind, because here's Heath-Barker for a goal that Geelong players couldn't have been more adamant they'd touched without submitting a statutory declaration. This was going to test the score review system... which didn't even get used... What in god's name is going on with this process?
Our response to this slice of luck was... conceding pretty much from the centre bounce. Then, our incredibly shit run with the bounce continued with Hore about to swoop on a loose ball inside 50, only for it to make a wacky momentum-killing change of direction. BUT, slender hope was pumped into our chances of doing something silly when Hanks got a goal from the kick in. Then, the ball finally worked to Hore's advantage, and the margin was back to 13.
It kept things interesting, but surely to god we weren't going to overcome a 28 point gap and the opposition's dominance to win. I was happy just to be involved in the last quarter, but the best outcome I could imagine was a brave defeat. Until Bannan chucked one through in the opening seconds, leaving plenty of time for Geelong to shit their shorts under pressure. They'd been so good for most of the game, but went missing when it counted. It still required us to kick two goals (or one goal + numerous behinds) to overrun them, which was where I thought we'd go wrong and end up doing the old "Maybe don't go [number] of points behind before turning up" whinge.
This goal came just at the right time to stop me going into a one-hour delay, assuming all the time that we'd lost. Instead, I was reduced to watching on a phone, while sitting in my car right outside Arden Street. Then, after 10 minutes of back-and-forth knife-edge drama, Bannan's second set shot was about 99.9% better than the first and left us a point down. Sure, the kick was paid a mark after travelling what looked like about nine metres, but who are we to question the AFLW umpires when they've got such a quality track record of getting decisions right.
I still refused to believe Geelong wouldn't kick another goal, even though they'd dropped anchor and stopped dead 30 minutes earlier. The way it was going, we may have run over the top if it went to extra time (and hopefully thrown off the schedule of the later game at Princes Park), and I was prepared to take that route if necessary. Then enter Paxy, for the ironic 'sinking of ex-coach' crumb. The chance came via a quick shot by Wotherspoon - who had as good a game as any forward without registering a score - which fell short. Bannan's marking contest propelled the ball into Paxman's path, surprisingly didn't bounce off in an unhelpful direction, and set up the snap to put us ahead with 2.30 left. Extra comedy value for a foundation player with a career record of a goal every three games sinking the only AFLW coach played under until this year.
I reacted by vigorously slapping my leg in celebration, which probably looked a bit suss to any onlookers, but once the joy was over I went back to fretting. After all, what's a five point lead if not a one point loss waiting to happen? So when the ball went inside Geelong's forward 50, I thought "here we go". Especially when the umpire signalled for high contact free, and we had to wait and see what direction he'd point in before knowing what was going on. Why do umpires gesture the 'wrong' way for frees? Is it supposed to indicate who the free is against, rather than who it's for, as if we couldn't work that out. And do we still need the extravagant gestures for free kick reasons? Just whistle, point, and get on with things. It's not 1945, we don't need dramatic deep squats and the 'no more bets' gesture to indicate holding the ball. These changes could save up to four seconds per game, and I'll wait patiently for my invitation to join the AFL Competition Committee.
This left Geelong still needing nothing less than a goal to win, and wouldn't you bloody know it, a hack kick from a pack landed perfectly to the advantage of a player 20 metres out, directly in front. It didn't travel much further than the one they paid to Bannan, but can't complain after getting away with one at our end. Here endeth, so it seems, the brave Melbourne revival. By the time she'd run 40 seconds off the clock, there wasn't enough time to get any score out of the middle without the most express centre break in AFLW history.
But, while the ads tell us you shouldn't trust anyone but Terri Scheer for landlord insurance, don't rely on her sister Chloe for clutch goalkicking. After landing one from distance + angle earlier, she horribly shanked this with perhaps the worst kick to win a game since Sticks Kernahan went OOF while only needing a point. Talk about a stroke of luck. Certainly made up for all the bad bounces earlier. There was all sorts of "we must think about the feelings of the player who missed" good vibes shit afterwards, but there's no denying it was a massive botch job. And for that, we say thank you very much.
This left us with 10 seconds to navigate the kick-in and survive for a miraculous victory. To lose after all that with a failed short pass or kick-in straight over the line may have put me away. Fortunately, the 'hoof it as far away from goal as possible' method helped run down the clock, and somehow we'd completed the biggest heist in league history.
If it was the world's most tedious niche movie, I'd have rolled the car window down, looked towards Arden Street from the left-side window of my car and dramatically said, "You're next!" But this first required them to lose to Carlton, which was never going to happen, would have been an incredibly weird thing to do, and you can't open your window when the car is turned off. Any onlookers would've already thought I was nuts after reacting to the Paxman goal, so no need to risk the police getting involved with a Prelim on the horizon. The only charges I want to be facing in November are charges to my card for Grand Final tickets.
2026 Daisy Pearce Medal votes
5 - Olivia Purcell
4 - Tahlia Gillard
3 - Tyla Hanks
2 - Ryleigh Wotherspoon
1 - Georgia Campbell
Apologies to Allen, Bannan, Harris, Heath-Barker, Lampard, and McNamara.
Leaderboard
The gap at the top narrows slightly, but thanks to Pegleg Pam from Geelong, only 10 votes remain, leaving Purcell with a mountain to climb for the heartwarming double-knee explosion-to-glory redemption story. How about Hanks wins this, Liv gets BOG in a Grand Final win, and everyone goes home happy?
Speaking of GF Best on Ground awards, Tahlia Gillard may still be waiting for the AFL to correct their error and present her the 2022 (Spring) medal, but she's right back in the mix to win our equally prestigious Defender of the Year. In 20+ years I've never manipulated the outcome of a vote yet, so keep that in mind in the event of a fitting draw with Chaplin.
And in the Rookie of the Year, Allen can still be caught, but it would require something massively insane to happen.
44 - Tyla Hanks
--- Needs two finals ---
37 - Olivia Purcell
--- Back for another go in 2027 ---
20 - Maeve Chaplin (JOINT LEADER: Defender of the Year), Tahlia Gillard (JOINT LEADER: Defender of the Year)
14 - Ryleigh Wotherspoon
12 - Kate Hore
9 - Jordyn Allen (PROVISIONAL WINNER: Rising Star Award), Mia Austin
7 - Tayla Harris, Eliza McNamara
6 - Megan Fitzsimon
4 - Georgia Campbell (LEADER: Ruck of the Year)
3 - Alyssa Bannan
1 - Shelley Heath-Barker, Aoife Horisk, Sarah Lampard
Goal of the Week
Impossible to go past the Paxman snap, and as I've got the spirit of Deesus flowing through me at the moment, I'm upgrading it to the season leader.
Next week +1
It's Hawthorn OR Carlton, both beaten this year with varying degrees of difficulty, but each capable of rumbling us on their day. There's a new frontier for humiliation if we allow the Hawks to make a Grand Final from 8th, so probably safer if Carlton win and we just take it from there. Who knows how many bullshit mid-week injuries we've got coming to us before then.
Final thoughts
It wasn't a performance that suggested we're about to become the New North, but delivered what we needed (eventually), when we needed it. What more could you ask for?

